Destructuring declarations
Sometimes it is convenient to destructure an object into a number of variables, for example:
This syntax is called a destructuring declaration. A destructuring declaration creates multiple variables at once. You have declared two new variables: name and age, and can use them independently:
A destructuring declaration is compiled down to the following code:
The component1() and component2() functions are another example of the principle of conventions widely used in Kotlin (see operators like + and *, for-loops as an example). Anything can be on the right-hand side of a destructuring declaration, as long as the required number of component functions can be called on it. And, of course, there can be component3() and component4() and so on.
Destructuring declarations also work in for-loops:
Variables a and b get the values returned by component1() and component2() called on elements of the collection.
Example: returning two values from a function
Assume that you need to return two things from a function - for example, a result object and a status of some sort. A compact way of doing this in Kotlin is to declare a data class and return its instance:
Since data classes automatically declare componentN() functions, destructuring declarations work here.
Example: destructuring declarations and maps
Probably the nicest way to traverse a map is this:
To make this work, you should
Present the map as a sequence of values by providing an
iterator()function.Present each of the elements as a pair by providing functions
component1()andcomponent2().
And indeed, the standard library provides such extensions:
So you can freely use destructuring declarations in for-loops with maps (as well as collections of data class instances or similar).
Underscore for unused variables
If you don't need a variable in the destructuring declaration, you can place an underscore instead of its name:
The componentN() operator functions are not called for the components that are skipped in this way.
Destructuring in lambdas
You can use the destructuring declarations syntax for lambda parameters. If a lambda has a parameter of the Pair type (or Map.Entry, or any other type that has the appropriate componentN functions), you can introduce several new parameters instead of one by putting them in parentheses:
Note the difference between declaring two parameters and declaring a destructuring pair instead of a parameter:
If a component of the destructured parameter is unused, you can replace it with the underscore to avoid inventing its name:
You can specify the type for the whole destructured parameter or for a specific component separately:
Name-based destructuring
Kotlin supports name-based destructuring declarations, where variables match properties by name instead of the position defined by componentN() functions in position-based destructuring.
In position-based destructuring, variables correspond to the order of componentN() functions, for example:
In this example, because destructuring relies on the order of componentN() functions, email receives the value of username, and username receives the value of email.
With name-based destructuring, property names determine which values are extracted rather than the position of componentN() functions:
Name-based destructuring is Experimental. When you enable this feature, it also introduces a new syntax for position-based destructuring using square brackets. Use this syntax for types where the order of elements matters, such as lists and other ordered collections, as well as unnamed tuples like Pair or Triple:
You can control how the compiler interprets destructuring declarations with the -Xname-based-destructuring compiler option.
It has the following modes:
only-syntaxenables the explicit form of name-based destructuring without changing the behavior of existing destructuring declarations.name-mismatchreports warnings when position-based destructuring in data classes uses variable names that don't match the property names.completeenables short-form name-based destructuring with parentheses and continues supporting position-based destructuring with square bracket syntax.
If you use complete mode, the short-form destructuring syntax with parentheses matches variables to property names instead of relying on position:
To enable name-based destructuring in your project, add the compiler option to your build configuration file: